Skip Navigation


Journal of African Economies Advance Access originally published online on January 11, 2008
Journal of African Economies 2008 17(3):451-464; doi:10.1093/jae/ejm029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/451    most recent
ejm029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow E62 - Fiscal Policy; [...] ; Taxation
Right arrow H50 - General
Right arrow H60 - General
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for the Study of African Economies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Explaining Procyclical Fiscal Policy in African Countries{dagger}

John Thornton*

Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, USA

* Corresponding author: John Thornton, Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund, 700 19th Street N.W., Washington DC 20431, USA. E-mail: jthornton{at}imf.org

Simple time series regressions for 37 low-income African countries during 1960–2004 suggest that government consumption is highly procyclical, with consumption responding more than proportionately to fluctuations in output in many cases. The results from a cross-country specification suggest that government consumption is more procyclical in those African countries that are more reliant on foreign aid inflows and that are less corrupt, and that it is less procyclical in countries with unequal income distribution and that are more democratic. These results contrast with those from recent research using data sets that comprise a more diverse groups of countries in terms of geography and income levels.


JEL classification: E62, H50, H60

{dagger} The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and should not be attributed to the International Monetary Fund.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.