Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isham, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; [...]
Right arrow Q16 - R&D; Agricultural Technology; [...]
Right arrow Z13 - Social Norms and Social Capital; Social Networks
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

J Af Eco 2002; 11:39-60
© 2002 Centre for the Study of African Economies

Article

The Effect of Social Capital on Fertiliser Adoption: Evidence from Rural Tanzania

Jonathan Isham

Middlebury College

Abstract

Do the characteristics of local social structures affect fertiliser adoption among rural households? This paper extends the model of technology adoption of Feder and Slade (1984) to incorporate social capital, and then tests the model with household data from two agro-ecological zones in rural Tanzania. Probit estimates of the model show that the probability of adoption of improved fertiliser in 1994–5 in the Central Plateau region is increasing in land under cultivation, cumulative adoption patterns, ethnically based social affiliations, the adoption of improved seeds, the availability of credit and extension services and the average years of residence in the village. In the Plains region, this probability is increasing in land under cultivation, ethnically based social affiliations and consultative norms. Overall, these results, which are robust after testing for the likely reverse causality of land under cultivation, support the finding that ethnically based and participatory social affiliations act as forms of social capital in the adoption decision.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.