Skip Navigation


Journal of African Economies Advance Access originally published online on August 3, 2007
Journal of African Economies 2007 16(5):668-704; doi:10.1093/jae/ejm012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/5/668    most recent
ejm012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du Plessis, S.
Right arrow Articles by Smit, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow N10 - General, International, or Comparative
Right arrow N17 - Africa; Oceania
Right arrow O40 - General
Right arrow O47 - Measurement of Economic Growth; [...]
Right arrow O49 - Other
Right arrow O55 - Africa
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for the Study of African Economies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

South Africa's Growth Revival After 1994

Stan Du Plessis and Ben Smit1

Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa

This paper aims to describe, identify underlying factors and seek explanations for South Africa's economic recovery since 1994, as evidenced by trends in growth and investment. Compared with an international peer group, the initial conditions for a dramatic growth recovery were inauspicious in 1994. Growth accounting methods are applied to distinguish the relative contributions of capital, labour and total factor productivity (TFP) to the growth revival, employing a broader range of measures for the contribution of labour at the aggregate level than used previously, and data of a more recent vintage. Sectoral developments since 1997 are also analysed using growth accounting. We find that TFP growth accounts for 50% or more of South Africa's economic recovery, with the result mainly holding at the sectoral level too. Examination of empirical studies suggests that this result is primarily explained by openness to trade and capital flows, lower uncertainty and lower interest rates. Finally we consider policy implications.


JEL classification: N100, N170, O400, O470, O490, O550

1 This paper was prepared for the conference ‘Economic policy under democracy: a 10-year review’ held in Stellenbosch on 28–29 October 2005. We are grateful for suggestions by the conference participants; and especially to Janine Aron, Johannes Fedderke, John Muellbauer and two anonymous referees for comments in the subsequent development of this paper. The responsibility for any remaining errors rests with the authors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.